Skip to main content

Have you ever wondered why, despite the recent interest in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), progress seems so slow? The Cambridge Centre for Social Innovation has some insights to share!

In a new series titled "Critical Perspectives on Social Innovation," Professors Paul Tracey and Neil Stott (Fellow at Lucy Cavendish College) dive deep into the reasons behind this slow advancement.

In the piece, "Social Innovation and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Five Blockages to Progress,"  Professor Tracey and Professor Stott explore why the ambitious SDGs, set to be achieved by 2030, are proving difficult to realize. They identify five major blockages that are stalling the progress. These include

1. Financial Resources

First and foremost, the issue of financial resources. Achieving the SDGs requires an astronomical $5 trillion annually. Governments alone cannot bear this burden; private firms and impact investors are also important players. However, there's a significant caveat: many investors are not deeply engaging with the SDGs or the communities they aim to support. While they claim alignment with the goals, few are meeting specific targets or genuinely understanding their impact. Without such engagement, even vast financial contributions may fall short of making a meaningful difference.

2. Greenwashing and Blue washing by Private Firms

Next, we encounter the problem of corporate superficiality. Numerous large corporations talk the talk about the SDGs but do not walk the walk. Research indicates that while these companies mention the SDGs, they rarely integrate them into their core strategies. This behaviour, known as greenwashing, underscores the need for genuine, committed corporate involvement.

3. Marginalization of the State

The third blockage pertains to the marginalization of the state. Social innovation often emphasizes the private and social sectors, viewing government as more of a hindrance than a help. However, meaningful progress towards the SDGs likely requires active state participation. Without robust government leadership and regulation, efforts can become fragmented and less effective.

4. Pressure for the Social Sector to Scale

The fourth blockage is the prevalent pressure for scaling. Many funders push social enterprises to replicate successful models in new locations. Yet, social issues are deeply contextual—what works in one place might not work in another. Instead of cloning organizations, we should focus on scaling ideas and adapting them to local contexts.

5. Top-down Interventions

Lastly, top-down approaches often alienate the communities they intend to support. Solutions imposed from above can miss the mark, failing to resonate with local cultures and needs. Instead, we need more bottom-up, community-driven initiatives that empower locals to frame and solve their problems.

Looking Ahead

So, what can social innovators do to overcome these blockages? Here, both professors promise to address this question in their next contribution to the series. Until then, let’s reflect on these insights and consider how we can support more engaged, context-aware, and genuinely impactful social innovation.

To read the first article follow the link here